Biden’s FBI Had No ‘Probable Cause’ To Raid Mar-a-Lago: Memos-lllllllllllllllll
Attorney General Pam Bondi and FBI Director Kash Patel are preparing to provide Congress with internal emails that they say show FBI officials warned the Justice Department during the Biden administration that there was insufficient probable cause to search former President Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago residence, officials told Just the News.

The emails are set to be provided to the Senate and House Judiciary Committees as early as Tuesday. This comes ahead of a scheduled deposition on Wednesday from former special prosecutor Jack Smith, who took over the Mar-a-Lago classified documents case just months after the August 2022 raid on Trump’s home—an event that significantly impacted the political landscape leading up to the 2024 election, Just the News reported.
Internal memos prepared by the FBI’s Washington field office indicate that agents did not believe probable cause had been established before the search of former President Donald Trump’s Florida residence, according to a source with direct knowledge of the documents slated to be turned over to Congress.
The source said the memos reflect internal concerns within the FBI about whether the Justice Department, under the Biden administration, had met the legal threshold required to obtain a search warrant. Despite those concerns, prosecutors moved forward with the search, officials told the outlet.
Disagreements among FBI personnel over the decision to search Trump’s Mar-a-Lago home have been previously reported, but the emails expected to be released provide more detailed accounts of the specific objections raised by agents regarding the sufficiency of probable cause, the outlet reported.
The search of Trump’s Mar-a-Lago residence became a major political flashpoint ahead of the 2024 presidential election and ultimately led to two federal indictments against Trump. Both cases were later dismissed.
Republicans have argued that the prosecutions were politically motivated, a claim the Justice Department has denied, said the report.
As part of its oversight of the federal investigations into Trump, the House Judiciary Committee recently issued a subpoena requiring Special Counsel Jack Smith to sit for a closed-door deposition on Wednesday, Just the News noted further.
“The Committee on the Judiciary is continuing to conduct oversight of the operations of the Office of Special Counsel you led — specifically, your team’s prosecutions of President Donald J. Trump and his co-defendants,” Chairman Jim Jordan wrote in the letter accompanying the subpoena two weeks ago. “Due to your service as Special Counsel, the Committee believes that you possess information that is vital to its oversight of this matter.”
Peter Koski, an attorney representing Smith, said the former special counsel will comply with the subpoena.
Ahead of Smith’s scheduled testimony, House Democrats have sought to compel the release of a classified version of his final report on the investigation. Trump’s legal team has filed court motions seeking to block the report’s release, said the outlet.
Smith may have believed he was untouchable when he led the Biden administration’s high-profile legal campaign against Donald Trump, but a group of Republican lawmakers has made it clear that his alleged misconduct won’t go unanswered.
Sen. Marsha Blackburn of Tennessee, joined by a coalition of Republican senators and one congressman, sent a formal letter to Attorney General Pam Bondi in October referring Smith to the Department of Justice’s Office of Professional Responsibility and two state bar associations for investigation.
The letter accuses the former special counsel of serious professional misconduct that could warrant disbarment, The New York Post reported.
“As part of Jack Smith’s weaponized witch hunt, the Biden DOJ issued subpoenas to several telecommunications companies in 2023 regarding our cell phone records, gaining access to the time, recipient, duration, and location of calls placed on our devices from January 4, 2021, to January 7, 2021,” the letter read.
“We have yet to learn of any legal predicate for the Biden Department of Justice issuing subpoenas to obtain these cell phone records,” the letter added.
I Smiled Through A Split Lip And Placed The Last Biscuit On Our Wedding China Just As My Husband Smirked, “Looks Like You Finally Learned Your Lesson.” I Looked Him Dead In The Eye And Said, “No, Terrence. This Is The Last Breakfast You Will Ever Eat As My Husband.” Then The Doorbell Rang. When He Saw Who Was Standing There, The Color Drained From His Face—And That Was Only The Beginning.

I smiled through a split lip and set the last biscuit on our wedding china just as my husband smirked across the table. “Looks like you finally learned your lesson.”
I met his eyes and said, very evenly, “No, Terrence. This is the last breakfast you will ever eat as my husband.”
Then the doorbell rang.
The first face he saw through the glass was Officer Daniel Ruiz. Beside him stood Officer Marisol Keene. A step farther back were Terrence’s mother, Diane, and Pastor Michael Avery from our church. I had asked them to come because Terrence had spent three years hiding behind other people’s faith in him. I wanted witnesses when that mask finally broke.
The color drained from his face so fast it looked painful.
He pushed back from his chair. “Vanessa, what the hell did you do?”
“Something I should have done a long time ago.”
At 6:12 that morning, while he was in the shower, I had texted 911 and then called the domestic violence advocate whose number I had kept hidden inside an old recipe book. By 6:40, I had photographed the bruise under my eye, the swelling in my cheek, the split in my lip, and the red marks on my shoulder where Terrence had slammed me into the pantry door after finding the apartment application in my desk the night before. I had also copied the recording from my phone—the one where his voice, thick with bourbon and fury, said, If you leave me, I will make sure nobody believes a word you say.
Officer Ruiz stepped inside. “Mrs. Brooks asked us to respond to a domestic violence report.”
Terrence’s expression changed instantly. He straightened his shirt and pulled on the mild, injured tone he used on school parents and church committees. “This is a misunderstanding. My wife is upset. We had an argument, that’s all.”
I slid a manila folder across the table. Inside were photographs, bank records, a notebook of dates, screenshots of apology texts, and copies of the lease application he tore in half after reading it. Officer Keene opened it, then looked directly at my face.
That was the moment Terrence understood charm was not going to save him.
He took one step toward me. Ruiz moved faster and caught his arm. Terrence jerked back, swearing, and Pastor Avery flinched. Diane pressed a hand to her mouth. For the first time in years, nobody rushed to explain Terrence to me. Nobody told me he was under stress. Nobody asked what I had done to provoke him.
They handcuffed him beside the breakfast table.
As Ruiz led him toward the door, Terrence twisted around and stared at me with naked hatred. “You’re ruining everything.”
“No,” I said. “I’m ending it.”
Twenty minutes later, I walked out with one suitcase, my folder, and the house key I left on the table beside his untouched plate. The biscuits were still warm when I closed the door behind me, but my marriage was over.
By noon, the county advocate had me in a safe hotel under a temporary confidential placement, a swollen face, and a legal pad full of decisions that could no longer wait. Her name was Carla Mendoza. She sat across from me with a paper cup of coffee and told me, in the steady voice of someone who had said it many times before, that what happened in my kitchen was not an isolated blowup. It was a documented pattern. That mattered. So did the fact that I had finally said it plainly: my husband was abusing me.
To most people in our Ohio suburb, Terrence Brooks was still the man from before everything curdled. He had taught high school history for nearly two decades. He could make sixteen-year-olds care about Reconstruction, voting rights, and the Constitution. Parents trusted him. Students remembered him years later. He shook hands like a candidate and listened like a pastor. For a long time, I trusted that version of him too.
Then, three years earlier, a female student accused him of harassment. The investigation dragged on for months. He was suspended, dissected in whispers, and stared at in grocery store checkout lines. When the district cleared him, the paperwork gave him back his innocence, but it did not give him back his life. Some people accepted the result. Many did not. He returned to work briefly, then was moved out of the classroom “for stability.” It hollowed him out.
What came after was slower than a collapse and harder to name. He drank. He stopped sleeping. He wanted to know where I was every hour, who I texted, why I smiled at my phone, why I spent twelve dollars at Target instead of ten. The first time he screamed at me, he cried afterward and said shame had broken something in him. The first time he bruised my wrist, he said he was terrified of losing me. The first time he shoved me, he swore it had been an accident. Abuse never introduced itself honestly. It came disguised as grief, then stress, then apology, then blame.
Two months before I left, I started documenting everything. A librarian I worked with noticed I flinched when my phone buzzed and quietly slipped me the number of a local domestic violence center. After that, I kept records the way Terrence used to teach his students to build an argument: dates, facts, corroboration. I photographed broken objects. I saved texts. I wrote down what he drank, what he said, where he stood in the room. I opened a checking account in my name only. I applied for a one-bedroom apartment across town. I did not feel brave. I felt hunted.
Terrence was released on bond that afternoon with a no-contact order.
He violated it in less than twenty-four hours.
The first message came from an unknown number: You know I never meant it. The second came through email: Don’t destroy us because of one night. By evening, a church friend had left a voicemail saying Terrence was “in a dark place” and wanted forgiveness. My attorney, Mara Ellison, told me to save everything. By the end of the week, the prosecutor had added witness intimidation and protection-order violations to the assault charge.
Then the police found the tracker.
It was attached underneath my car, small enough to fit in a palm. A search warrant for the house uncovered more: a hidden camera above the kitchen cabinets, spyware on the old laptop I used for banking, and a folder on Terrence’s desktop labeled “insurance,” filled with screenshots of my messages, receipts, and location history. That changed how everyone saw the case. This was no drunken argument. It was control, planned and practiced.
At the preliminary hearing, Terrence tried one last time to look misunderstood. He wore a navy suit, shaved closely, and sat with both hands folded like a man attending a school board meeting. But the judge had my photographs, the audio file, the tracker, the illegal recordings, and the stack of violations. The protective order was extended immediately.
When I stepped out of the courthouse, Carla squeezed my hand and said, “He knows now.”
She was right. For the first time since this began, Terrence understood I was not coming back.
The criminal case lasted seven months. The divorce took nine.

That was the part nobody tells you when they admire survival from a distance: leaving is dramatic, but rebuilding is administrative. It is affidavits, passwords, forwarding addresses, pharmacy transfers, changed beneficiaries, credit freezes, therapy appointments, and learning how to sleep without bracing for footsteps in the hallway.
Terrence fought everything at first. Through his attorney, he claimed the tracker was for “marital accountability.” He said the camera was for home security. He said the spyware had been installed accidentally during a software bundle. He said I was exaggerating, then unstable, then vindictive. But facts are stubborn when they are properly documented.
The forensic examiner traced the spyware purchase to his personal debit card. The hidden camera footage showed he had positioned it to capture the kitchen table and back door, not the entry points of the house. The bond violations came from accounts linked to his devices. Even his own words trapped him. In one message to a friend, entered into evidence later, he wrote: If she leaves, I lose the last thing that still makes me look normal.
That sentence ended whatever was left of his public sympathy.
Pastor Avery testified reluctantly but honestly. He admitted Terrence had come to him twice in the prior year asking for “guidance” on how to get a wife back “under control.” Diane, his mother, took longer. For weeks she defended him in the careful language families use when truth threatens the whole structure.
Then she saw the photographs. She asked to meet me at a diner near the courthouse. She cried before the waitress even poured coffee. “I knew he was angry,” she said. “I did not know he had become cruel.” It was not enough to undo anything, but it was honest, and by then I valued honesty more than comfort.
Two days before trial, Terrence accepted a plea agreement. He pleaded guilty to domestic battery, unlawful surveillance, and multiple violations of the protective order. He lost his teaching license. The judge sentenced him to thirty months in state custody, followed by supervised probation, mandatory treatment, and a long-term protection order forbidding any direct or indirect contact with me.
At sentencing, I read my victim impact statement without shaking.
I told the court that people often imagine abuse as constant chaos, but mine had often looked like order: folded towels, tracked receipts, monitored calls, measured silence. I said that Terrence had not become violent because his life fell apart; he became violent because control felt easier than grief. I said being falsely accused years earlier had wounded him deeply, and that wound deserved truth and compassion. But pain was not permission. Humiliation was not permission. Alcohol was not permission. Nothing was.
The divorce decree was finalized six weeks later. I kept my retirement account, my car, and a small share from the house sale. The wedding china was sold in a Saturday estate lot with the dining table and the matching sideboard. I did not want any object that had learned how to watch me bleed.
A year after the arrest, I moved into a second-floor apartment with narrow windows and terrible beige carpet. It was not glamorous. It was quiet. The first morning I ate breakfast there, I used a chipped white plate from a discount store and sat in sunlight that belonged only to me. No one asked where I had been. No one checked my phone. No one measured the expression on my face.
Sometimes freedom arrives like sirens and handcuffs. Sometimes it arrives like an ordinary kitchen, a locked door, and the sound of your own breathing no longer being monitored.
My name is Vanessa Brooks. I was married for eighteen years to a man many people admired. I left him on a Thursday morning in March.
And that was the first true thing I had done for myself in years.
Part 2
The hotel room felt too quiet.
Vanessa sat on the edge of the bed, still in the same clothes she had worn when she walked out of her house that morning. Her face throbbed in dull, rhythmic pulses. Every time she blinked, she saw the moment again—Terrence’s hand, the pantry door, the sound her body made when it hit wood.
Carla Mendoza sat across from her, flipping through the documents Vanessa had brought.
“You did everything right,” Carla said. “Documentation like this? It changes cases.”
Vanessa let out a breath that felt like it had been trapped in her lungs for years. “I didn’t do it to build a case. I did it so I wouldn’t forget what was real.”
Carla nodded. “That’s usually how it starts.”
There was a knock at the door. Two police officers stood outside—Officer Ruiz again, along with a different woman this time, a victim liaison who handed Vanessa a folder filled with resources, next steps, and something Vanessa hadn’t expected:
Validation.
Not sympathy. Not pity.
Recognition.
By that afternoon, Vanessa had spoken to an attorney—Mara Ellison—who moved quickly, efficiently, like someone who had seen this pattern too many times to waste energy on shock.

“We’re filing for a protective order extension,” Mara said over the phone. “And we’ll begin divorce proceedings immediately.”
Vanessa hesitated for half a second.
Eighteen years.
A house.
A life that had once felt real.
Then she looked at her reflection in the mirror—the split lip, the fading bruise, the woman who had learned to speak in careful tones just to survive dinner.
“Yes,” she said. “Do it.”
That night, Terrence tried calling again.
Blocked.
Then email.
Saved.
Then messages through mutual friends.
Documented.
Each attempt didn’t pull her back.
It pushed her further away.
By midnight, Vanessa understood something she had never fully allowed herself to believe before:
This wasn’t the worst moment of her life.
It was the last one.
Part 3
The next week stripped everything down to facts.
Court dates. Statements. Evidence.
Terrence showed up to the preliminary hearing looking composed, controlled, almost convincing. Clean suit. Calm posture. The version of himself that had fooled people for years.
But Vanessa had brought something stronger than appearances.
Proof.
The photos spoke first.
Then the recording.
Then the timeline—painfully precise, impossible to dismiss.
When the prosecutor played the audio file—Terrence’s voice, low and threatening, promising to destroy her credibility—the courtroom shifted.
Not dramatically.
Quietly.
The way truth settles into a room and refuses to leave.
Terrence’s attorney tried to frame it as emotional distress. Stress from his career collapse. Alcohol. Miscommunication.
Vanessa watched it all without reacting.
Because she knew something they didn’t:
Excuses only work when there’s doubt.
And she had removed all doubt.
After the hearing, Terrence tried one last time.
In the hallway, as deputies escorted him out, he caught her eye.
“This isn’t who we are,” he said.
Vanessa met his gaze, steady and unflinching.
“No,” she replied. “This is exactly who you are.”
That was the last conversation they ever had.
Part 4
The investigation uncovered more than anyone expected.
The tracker was just the beginning.
Forensic analysts pulled data from Terrence’s devices—search histories, downloaded apps, hidden folders. Patterns emerged quickly.
Monitoring.
Recording.
Planning.
Vanessa sat with Mara as the report was explained in careful, clinical language.
“He installed surveillance software over a year ago,” Mara said. “He accessed your messages, your location, even your keystrokes.”
Vanessa didn’t feel shocked.
She felt… confirmed.
“That’s why he always knew,” she murmured. “Where I was. Who I talked to.”
Mara nodded. “Yes.”
There was also the camera.
Positioned not for security—but for control.
The angle, the placement, the stored footage—all pointed to one thing: observation, not protection.
Terrence hadn’t just been reacting.
He had been managing her.
Tracking her.
Containing her.
That realization didn’t break Vanessa.
It clarified everything.
Back at the hotel, she sat alone for a long time, staring at her phone.
Then she did something small, but final.
She deleted his contact.
Not blocked.
Not hidden.
Erased.
Because for the first time, she didn’t need protection from him.
She had distance.
Part 5
The plea deal came quietly.
No dramatic confession. No emotional apology.
Just paperwork.
Terrence accepted guilt in exchange for reduced sentencing risk. His attorney framed it as practicality.
Vanessa saw it for what it was:
Surrender.
At the sentencing hearing, the courtroom was fuller than expected. Former colleagues. Church members. People who had once admired Terrence sat in stiff silence, watching the truth settle into place.
When Vanessa stood to speak, the room held its breath.
She didn’t raise her voice.
She didn’t cry.
“I stayed,” she said, “because I believed things would go back to what they were. But I was wrong. This wasn’t a temporary version of him. This was the truth I didn’t want to see.”
She paused, letting the words land.
“Leaving wasn’t brave. It was necessary.”
Terrence didn’t look at her.
Not once.
When the judge delivered the sentence—custody, probation, long-term protection order—it felt less like a victory and more like a closing door.
Afterward, outside the courthouse, Carla stood beside her again.
“It’s over,” she said.
Vanessa shook her head slightly.
“No,” she replied. “It’s finished.”
There was a difference.
Over meant something could come back.
Finished meant it never would.
And as Vanessa walked down the courthouse steps into open air, sunlight hitting her face without fear, she realized something else:
She hadn’t just ended a marriage.
She had taken back authorship of her own life.
And this time—
no one else would get to rewrite it.